The Strait of Hormuz continues to operate as the world’s most critical maritime chokepoint, but it remains under constant pressure from security threats and regional tensions. Roughly one-fifth of global oil flows through this narrow passage, making any disruption immediately felt across international markets.
Recent years have seen a pattern of attacks and seizures involving commercial vessels, including incidents where tankers were boarded, diverted, or damaged by drones and explosive devices. These events are often tied to broader geopolitical tensions in the region, particularly involving Iran and Western-aligned nations. In several cases, ships have been targeted for their affiliations, cargo origins, or perceived political leverage.
For commercial operators, transit through the Strait is no longer routine. Shipping companies have increased security measures, rerouted vessels when possible, and coordinated more closely with naval forces operating in the region. U.S. and allied maritime patrols have also stepped up their presence, escorting vessels and monitoring activity to deter further incidents.
For contractors, the environment around the Strait of Hormuz continues to drive demand for maritime security, surveillance, and logistics support roles. As long as tensions remain elevated, the risk of ship attacks and interference will persist—keeping this narrow waterway at the center of both global trade and security operations.
HAITI — Erik Prince has moved beyond planning and into early operational activity in Haiti, following the previously reported agreement to deploy nearly 200 contractors to support anti-gang effort
Initial reports in 2025 outlined a deal between Haiti’s transitional government and Prince’s firm, Vectus Global, to deploy a multinational force of contractors aimed at reclaiming territory from heavily armed gangs. The agreement included both short-term security operations and a longer-term role in rebuilding government revenue systems.
As of early 2026, elements of that plan are now active on the ground.
Haitian authorities have confirmed that contractor-led operations are underway, including targeted anti-gang actions and support to local security forces. These efforts are focused primarily in and around Port-au-Prince, where armed groups continue to control significant portions of the العاصمة and key infrastructure routes.
The contractor presence remains limited in scale compared to traditional warzone deployments, but it is operationally significant. Reports indicate that personnel tied to Prince’s network are engaged in advisory roles, direct support operations, and the use of surveillance and strike capabilities aimed at disrupting gang leadership structures.
This development comes as the broader international effort—now operating under the Gang Suppression Force, formerly the Kenya-led MSS mission—continues to struggle with manpower, funding, and operational effectiveness.
Unlike Iraq or Afghanistan, Haiti represents a different type of contractor environment. There is no large U.S. military footprint, and contractor operations are occurring in a fragmented, high-risk urban setting with limited oversight and evolving rules of engagement.
The situation remains volatile. Armed gangs still dominate large areas of the capital, and the use of private contractors has sparked ongoing debate among analysts and policymakers. Critics argue that introducing private military forces could complicate command structures and weaken long-term state authority, while supporters point to the urgent need for immediate security solutions.
Looking ahead, Haiti is shaping into a potential growth market for contractors—but only if stability improves. If current operations succeed in opening key routes and restoring some level of control, demand for security, logistics, and infrastructure contractors could expand quickly. If not, contractor roles will likely remain limited, specialized, and high-risk.
For now, the shift is clear: what started as a proposed deployment is now an active, evolving contractor presence on the ground in Haiti.
IRAQ — The United States maintains a much smaller military presence in Iraq today compared to the height of operations during the Iraq War. Over the past several years, American forces have consolidated into a limited number of strategic locations as the mission transitioned from combat operations to advising, intelligence support, and regional security cooperation. Most remaining U.S. forces are concentrated in northern Iraq and around diplomatic facilities in Baghdad, where they continue to support Iraqi security forces and monitor extremist threats.
Several key facilities still host U.S. personnel. The primary operational hub is Erbil Air Base in the Kurdistan Region, where U.S. forces coordinate training and logistical support missions. In Baghdad, American personnel also operate from the U.S. Embassy Baghdad and the nearby Baghdad Diplomatic Support Center, which functions as a logistical and security hub supporting embassy operations. These facilities rely heavily on private contractors, security teams, and logistical personnel who help maintain daily operations.
U.S. Locations Still Hosting Personnel in Iraq
Erbil Air Base – Primary U.S. military hub in northern Iraq
U.S. Embassy Baghdad – Largest U.S. diplomatic compound in the world
Baghdad Diplomatic Support Center – Logistics and operational support facility near Baghdad International Airport
Camp Union III – Previously coalition headquarters, now associated with NATO Mission Iraq
Ain al-Asad Air Base – Major former U.S. base that has largely transitioned to Iraqi control but historically hosted U.S. forces
Although the number of bases has declined significantly, the remaining locations continue to face security challenges. Rocket, drone, and missile attacks by Iran-aligned militia groups have targeted several U.S. facilities in Iraq in recent months. These threats highlight the fragile security environment surrounding the last American positions still operating in the country, even as the broader U.S. military footprint continues to shrink.