Mercenaries and modern private military contractors may look similar on the surface—both are paid to operate in conflict zones—but the reality is very different, especially in today’s contracting environment. Historically, mercenaries were individuals or small groups hired directly for combat, often with little oversight, loyalty, or long-term structure. From ancient Greek fighters to Renaissance condottieri, they were brought in to fight wars for profit, not policy. Their allegiance was tied to whoever paid them, and once the money stopped, so did their mission. That lack of accountability is exactly why the term “mercenary” still carries a negative reputation today.
Around the World
When the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) was stripped of its independent mandate in July 2025—cutting more than 80% of its programs and staff—it left a vacuum in the global aid system. Commentators have been quick to suggest that the private sector could “replace” USAID. On paper, the idea sounds efficient. In reality, it’s far more complicated.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has denied a protest filed by Amentum Parsons Logistics Services LLC, allowing the U.S. Army to proceed with extending an existing LOGCAP task order awarded to KBR Services, LLC in support of U.S. European Command (EUCOM).