According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, DynCorp International, LLC, of Fort Worth, Texas, protests the award of a contract to URS Federal Services, Inc., under request for proposals (RFP) No. W58RGZ-14-R-0270, which was issued by the Department of the Army, Army Contracting Command, Redstone, for aviation field maintenance support services. DynCorp challenges the Army's evaluation of the offerors' technical proposals, the protester's past performance, and URS's price/cost proposal, and also argues that the best value tradeoff and source selection was unreasonable.
contract protest

C&S Corporation, of Seoul, Korea, protests the award of a contract to KF&S Corporation, also of Seoul, Korea, under request for proposals (RFP) No. W91QVN-15-R-0036, which was issued by the Department of the Army, Army Contracting Command, for contract security guard services.
C&S argues that KF&S's proposal should have been found unacceptable for failing to meet the solicitation's prime contractor corporate experience requirements. The protester also asserts that KF&S included forged labor union documents in its proposal, which should disqualify that firm from award. In addition, C&S challenges the veracity of the agency's statements responding to the forgery allegation, which we view as an assertion that the agency was motivated by bias and bad faith.

U.S. Government Accountability Office — Louis Berger Services, Inc. (LBS), of Morristown, New Jersey, protests the terms of request for proposals (RFP) No. N33191-14-R-1010, issued by the Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, for base operating support services at Naval Station Rota, Spain. LBS specifically challenges the RFP's inclusion of a definitive responsibility criterion relating to possession of certain Spanish "Certificates of Classification."








